So that's the four levels of this. The learning culture, team orientation, outcomes, orientation and what's your talent strategy. - Brian Elliott
Brian Elliott returns to Work 20XX with a fresh lens on scaling distributed work, investing in people, and navigating the J-curve of technology adoption inside teams. Because what works for supporting distributed teams, works for increasing team AI adoption. Align on real goals, only three to five, and check in with tweet sized updates, once a week, on those three goals.
Please join me in welcoming Brian Elliott back to the Work 20XX podcast from Running Remote.
As co-founder of Future Forum, co-author of How the Future Works, and now with his new Newsletter, Work Forward, Brian is a data-filled champion of distributed teams years and years, long before Covid, before it was in fashion.
He continues in that tradition with his latest, the Work Forward newsletter, chock-full-o case studies, research, and exercises to help you get more out of your team. He pulls from the best, including a heavy dose of Atlassian, PagerDuty, and Neiman Marcus.
Recorded April 30, Fair Market, Austin
Special thanks to Liam Martin, Egor Borushko, Ana Maria Bennett & Team Running Remote
Brian Elliott v3: Invest, J-Curve, Goals, Team | Work 20XX podcast with Jeff Frick Ep43 from Running Remote
Brian Elliott v3: Invest, J-Curve, Goals, Team | Work 20XX podcast with Jeff Frick Ep43 from Running Remote 2025, Austin, TX
English Transcript
© Copyright 2025 Menlo Creek Media, llc.
Cold Open:
Okay, so the camera’s going?
Yep, alright
So we are speeding.
So we'll go
in 3, 2, 1.
Jeff Frick:
Hey welcome back everybody Jeff Frick here. Coming to you for a very special episode of Work 20XX We're in Austin, Texas at the Running Remote Conference hundreds of the leading minds about remote work but it’s important to always remember everything that’s good for remote work is also good for hybrid. Also good for distributed teams. Also even good if you're back in the office. So there's a lot of great lessons. And we're excited to have our next guest who's really literally wrote the book on this topic, and now he's writing a new newsletter. So let's check in with Brian Elliott.
Brian Elliott:
Hey Jeff
Jeff Frick:
Brian great to see you
Brian Elliott:
Good to see you too. Glad to be here with you.
Jeff Frick:
Your new company, CEO of Work Forward. And you’ve got a really cool and deeply researched newsletter that's going out on your Substack.
Brian Elliott:
Yeah. So ‘Work Forward’ on Substack is my newsletter. [https://theworkforward.substack.com] It's got a combination of like all the data in my data geekiness that people come to expect from me, but also a lot of storytelling. Like, I just wrote a story the other day that combined some learnings from PagerDuty and Atlassian around workplaces, doing the piece on like how to manage outcomes, especially in distributed teams, but also the impact that has on generative AI. There's a lot of content out there that I learned from listening to people that are actually doing the work, that are actually leading the way, and I try to bring those stories to everybody else
Jeff Frick:
Yeah, I love it because you are you are out talking to people. So, in fact I noted the Atlassian. Three things you noted there was Radical Transparency. Enforced Focus and Lightweight Updates. I wonder if you can expand on that a little bit.
Brian Elliott:
Yeah, sure.
Jeff Frick:
I was at Atlassian Summit two weeks ago and I love their focus on goals.
Brian Elliott:
Yeah, goals focus has really been a big thing for me for a long time. In my startup days I learned the hard way really that like if you don't have focus on like what's the most important two, three things for you to get done, it's really hard to get the team aligned. And by the way, being in a startup forces that kind of discipline. Companies get bigger, they get sloppy, to be honest, and people don't have alignment anymore. So Molly Sands, who leads the research team at at Team Anywhere with along with Annie Dean, she and I talked about this in depth in terms of what they do. So three simple rules that I really loved. Number one is 3 to 5 goals per team. And that's it on a quarterly basis, 3 to 5 goals that are clearly articulated, that are measurable, that you can talk about. And at least once a month go, hey, how are we doing against that? Are we moving forward or are we not? Where are we struggling? What can we do to get back on track or is this not working? So that's number one. Number two is transparency and that's a huge deal I can see inside of Atlassian anybody else's goals, any team's goals. I can subscribe to. So if there's something going on in marketing that impacts my team, I can see how they're doing. That takes all the mystery out of it and also means we can actually, you know, go forward and do better. The third one is a little mechanical, but I've heard so many people complain Oh my God I have to do 25 updates a week in three different systems. There's is really simple Tweet size updates once a week on those top goals. So if you think about it that way, it's like, I really just want to make it clear what we're working on. I want to know where we are, be transparent and make it simple for people to do. You can go a long way in getting people aligned and marching in a common direction,
Jeff Frick:
Right, I love it just the forced prioritization. So the radical transparency though can be hard for some companies.
Brian Elliott:
It Is
Jeff Frick:
But one thing, I just attended your session a little while ago that that everybody should be able to do. You know, and you're talking about middle managers being just burned out. Stuck in the middle. But at the same time they're not getting any training about this new world so What is going on there? Why aren’t people investing in these people?
Brian Elliott:
Yeah. So it's really sad like I think it was Gallup that put out a survey just a couple of weeks ago saying that something like 44% of managers globally have no training whatsoever. That's just really sad when you think about it. It's not surprising, right? People get promoted into the job because they’re the most senior person on the team, but then they're expected all of a sudden to be a manager and you've got no support in doing it. So that's bad. Kate Lister put out a research piece last year saying that something like 25% of managers have any management background training support in leading distributed teams, 75% of those managers are leading distributed teams. So we're kind of leaving them out to dry in a lot of different ways. There's simple things you can do to address those sorts of things, but man, you can't expect that you're going to get better as a company and as an organization if you don't invest in leadership, right And especially given how fast the world around us is changing to ignore that is like pretending that we can actually just keep on limping our way through all the dramatic changes facing us from you know, the economy to generative AI to flexibility.
Jeff Frick:
Well, you went through kind of a Maslow's triangle of the different attributes. And the one on the top was a learning culture so I mean you would think if maybe people don't have a learning culture, they think we've been doing it this way forever, and maybe we can stay at the top of the Fortune 500 for another 60 years. But that's not the case at all.
Brian Elliott:
No, no, some of the data that’s wild for me is like 1940s, 65 years was the average tenure of the S&P 500. 2014 is like 17 years. So just like longevity of firms isn't there in the same way. I think a lot of people say learning culture, but they're not putting the resources behind it because you've got to make a short term investment for long term gains, right. You gotta be willing to say, hey, look, we're going to loosen up this quarter's goals enough to give people actual room to get their hands on these new generative AI tools, for example, because they’re not going to be more productive coming out of the gates. Right? Any time you have to learn new skills and adapt to new ways of working, it's going to take time and effort. If you're not willing to put a little bit of slack in the system, you're not going to get over the hump of that learning curve that's going to give you the long term gains. But if you're gonna have a learning culture, you've got to put time, energy and resources behind it to make it happen.
Jeff Frick:
And you really focused on that last talk about the J Curve, that that by rule There's a downward dip in the slope. Because you gotta learn the new thing.
Brian Elliott:
Yeah, you gotta think about this is like it's happened in every single technology that’s been massive and major. The initial downward slope is it takes investment to get that good enough. And so think about this with generative AI. For the past couple of years, a lot of what we've been doing is swivel chair, right. It’s like okay, I've got my regular process and I'm coming over here into this other tool to figure it out. It's also people are figuring out like What's it good at? What can I use it for? What can I do with it? Right Those investments are going to take productivity down for a period of time. But if you believe and I do, that this can actually make you more efficient, more effective and better longer term. You have to pay that price sometime. And by the way, if you're not paying that price now one of your competitors might be. And eventually what's going to happen is you're going to be sitting there saying, why are my people not adopting this stuff and going faster? And the answer is going to be because you've given them no time to do it.
Jeff Frick:
It's crazy. So another really just crazy dichotomy you pointed out was with the difference on the investment in customer side. Customer segmentation customer journey, buying journey sophisticated micro segmentation. And yet one's treating the office like it's 1955 Mad Men. It's crazy.
Brian Elliott:
Yeah yeah So the employee experience does not get the level of investment that customer experience does unfortunately. We've seen the impact of technology on customers and digital transformations and all the rest of it. We’ve not done the same thing with employees. And I’ll give you like even workplace is a great example of that. Workplace teams have undergone more pressure and need to transform in the last five years than anybody else. More than I.T., more than HR, more than even leaders in some ways. And I can see the difference between firms that are actually putting support into those teams to help them rethink the role of offices, right which are really are essential for a lot of teams in terms of team building and collaboration. They're redesigning spaces. They may be shrinking it. They're giving people that are distributed access to more tools, but also those leaders are putting in place small teams to help. A lot of other managers who we've just noted aren't really trained to make them capable of doing like a lot better team building with their organizations. The leaders are doing that are getting further ahead. There's about half that workforce crowd though that wants to do those things, but their leadership is like it's not worth the investment or maybe they're all going to come back. And so they're frozen in place and it's just like generative AI. The longer you wait to start experimenting, innovating, piloting out new ways of working, the further behind you're going to be.
Jeff Frick:
The further behind you go So, it’s interesting, I don't know, I think you're the first one to really tie together the management skills that that enable people to be successful at distributed work Yeah are the same set of skills and behaviors that will enable the managers to drive successful adoption of AI in their team. Which as you said, right now, one of the biggest challenges everybody has. I thought that was so insightful. So what are the key attributes that cross that line?
Brian Elliott:
Yes. We already talked about like a learning culture which sort of sits at the top of that Maslow's structure of needs The second layer below that is ‘Team Oriented’ because there's not a one size fits all in organizations when it comes to flexibility, right? The needs of, teams that are in Europe is different from the US is different from China. The needs of my engineering organization are probably different from sales. So figuring out at the team level, how are we going to adopt flexible work is also going be the same thing as how does generative AI fit in our flow and rhythms of work? So you have to invest at the team level below that, maybe the biggest one at the end of the day, that ‘Outcomes Orientation’ we talked about in terms of like Molly was explaining at Atlassian what they do. If you can focus on what are our most important goals how are we going to grow our business? Then people can sit there and say, okay, how can I use those tools to achieve growth, as opposed to hearing the word efficiency and thinking layoffs, or from a flexibility perspective, instead of having goals you're focused on are they sitting in their butts in seats and being monitored? And the base level really at the end of the day is What's my talent strategy? Am I after the best and brightest capable people? Am I going to invest in them in terms of training and skills? Because I know that the agility we needed as an organization is going to require really great people that are supported and feel engaged. Or am I back in command and control and telling people what to do and hoping that somehow the CEO is smart enough to see every curveball that's coming at them and get past it? So that's the four levels of this. The learning culture, team orientation, outcomes, orientation and what's your talent strategy.
Jeff Frick:
I confused you there I made you go top to bottom instead of bottom to top. Very good, good knowledge. You’ve done that one a few times with people
Brian Elliott:
Yeah I can take it either direction. I've done this enough times in enough conversations. I know where the problems are.
Jeff Frick:
Well I wrote down some of these things as you said just to call it out, you know, outcomes versus attendance. Yeah. Objectives versus efficiency. And you didn't call it out. But Nick [Bloom] called it out. And he did today here again Nick Bloom on profit versus productivity. Yeah. He’s like people are going to continue on this route because it's profitable That's right. It makes a lot of sense for people. That's right. And the piece of it that he highlighted and you did to is the is retention.
Brian Elliott:
That's right. Because the people that are most likely to leave unfortunately for you are the ones that are the most qualified because they're the ones that have the other options. That's right. And by the way, one of the things that I love about this is we keep talking about flexibility in office workers. The same thing can apply to frontline workers. I did a great case study on Neiman Marcus Group with Eric Severson who was the Chief People Officer there. They actually allowed people who were store associates and operators to do some of their work from home. So, for example, if I'm a store associate, I actually also managing customer list and I'm doing training and I'm doing some merchandizing. Some of those can be done from home. I also importantly want some schedule flexibility. They found that those investments in flexibility for frontline workers gave them literally industry leading retention numbers, that kind of retention number, by the way, also shows up in the bottom line of organizations. So you can make those investments. And this is not just an office centric thing. You can do it on the frontline too, and it pays off on the bottom line results
Jeff Frick:
Yeah. So just to kind of wrap it up, I just want to something you acknowledged again in the talk you just had that this is not easy and that, you know, a lot of the tooling and the Gen AI and all these things will take care of the, the mundane and the rote and the stupid stuff. But it's not going to take care of the hard stuff.
Brian Elliott:
That's right.
Jeff Frick:
So it really it’s freeing up time for you to invest in this stuff that's going to be hard and a little bit more difficult
Jeff Frick:
That's right. And I'll tell you, one of the things that I've observed though is I think a lot of CEOs are under pressure, right. CEO turnover hit an all time high last year. The board pressure, the market pressure is through the roof. Some of them and I've been in this spot before are falling back into what can kind of feel comfortable, which is you're trained to have all the answers. Right, right So you start giving out commands and having all the answers. It’s hard but part of this is how do I think about this as I can still set those big aspirational goals, but I can say, I need all of you to figure out how we're going to get there. I'm going to enlist you in doing this. And by the way, the reward is you'll learn to your career is going to grow and go additional places by doing that. But as the leader, you got to think about this as not just do I have all the answers, but how does my team have to have the answers to drive the the objectives that we've got?
Jeff Frick:
Right. I just love it. It just keeps coming back to team, team, team. Because that's Yeah that's the unit where stuff gets accomplished, right? Individuals contribute but it’s really the teams that move everything along.
Brian Elliott:
That's right. I mean what gets automated is things that are rote, individual tasks. What remains is complex. It's hard. It's creative, it's interdisciplinary in nature. That's why more than ever, actually, human centered leadership is going to be a much better answer than falling back into I've got all the answers and I'm the boss.
Jeff Frick:
You keep sharing the answers Brian on Work Forward And we’ll keep subscribing cause you've got so much great content in those things And I love all the use cases.
Brian Elliott:
Thanks Jeff
Jeff Frick:
And it’s not just 1 or 2 companies, as you showed on that slide. There were dozens and dozens of companies that are adopting this. If you're not, there may be a slot a logo on that slide (for) of one of your competitors
Brian Elliott:
Exactly, exactly. Somebody in your industry most certainly is.
Jeff Frick:
All right Brian well it was great to catch up again as always. And thanks for time.
Brian Elliott:
Thanks, Jeff. Appreciate it.
Jeff Frick:
All right. He's Brian I’m Jeff. You’re watching Work 20XX Special Edition coming from Running Remote in Austin, Texas. Thanks for watching. Thank you listening on the podcast Catch you next time take care.
Cold Close
Out
Awesome
Dude, you're a rock star.
The music was like
Brian Elliott v3: Invest, J-Curve, Goals, Team | Work 20XX podcast with Jeff Frick Ep43 from Running Remote 2025, Austin, TX
English Transcript
© Copyright 2025 Menlo Creek Media, llc.
Founder and CEO, Work Forward
Work Forward
https://www.workforward.com/
Work Forward - The Newsletter
https://theworkforward.substack.com/
https://www.workforward.com/newsletter
LinkedIn
https://www.linkedin.com/in/belliott/
Future Forum
https://futureforum.com/
How the Future Works
How the Future Works: Leading Flexible Teams to Do the Best Work of Their Lives
By Helen Kupp, Sheela Subramanian, Brian Elliott
Wiley - 2022-May - ISBN:111987095X - ISBN13:9781119870951
https://futureforum.com/how-the-future-works/
—---------
Running Remote
https://runningremote.com/
Bryan’s Sessions at Running Remote 2025, Austin
Measuring The Footprint of Real Estate in a Hybrid Company
Izabella Lorenz, Global Real Estate & Workplace Strategy @ Zoom
Noel McNulty @ Director, Global Real Estate and Workplace @ Twilio
Ebbie Wisecarver, Chief Design Officer @ WeWork
Moderated by: Brian Elliott, CEO @ Work Forward
As hybrid work reshapes corporate real estate needs, how can companies measure and optimize their real estate footprint? Industry leaders from Zoom, Twilio and WeWork will share insights on balancing flexibility, efficiency, and employee experience in a hybrid environment. Moderated by Brian Elliott, CEO of Work Forward, this panel will explore strategies for right-sizing office spaces, leveraging data-driven decision-making, and aligning workplace strategy with the future of work.
Remote and GenAI: Successfully Navigating the Future of Work
Brian Elliott, CEO @ Workforward
While generative AI and remote work might feel like very separate topics, the roots of successful programs are the same for both. Flexible ways of working and Generative AI adoption are both seismic shifts in how people work, driven by technology advances but requiring intention and investment to be successfully deployed.
Too often, the solution to flexibility and GenAI comes with top-down approaches that don’t work for employees. Return-to-office mandates drive out top talent and diverse employees. The same approach is being taken with GenAI: 85% of executives are mandating or encouraging the use of Gen AI to drive efficiency, but 77% of employees feel like the tools have decreased productivity.
Generative AI and flexibility at work can both unlock employee engagement, productivity and team results – but only if leaders build programs that drive successful adoption and engage employees in their benefits.
In this session, Work Forward CEO Brian Elliott will share the common attributes of companies that have been successful in adapting to change. Drawing on the latest research about GenAI and flexibility, as well as case studies from his work with leaders, you’ll get a blueprint for a successful path forward.
—---
People, Items and articles mentioned in the interview
-------
Molly Sands
Head of the Teamwork Lab, Atlassian
https://www.linkedin.com/in/mollysands/
Annie Dean
VP, Workplace + Future of Work Transformation, Atlassian
https://www.linkedin.com/in/anniedeanzaitzeff/
Atlassian Teamwork Lab
https://community.atlassian.com/forums/Teamwork-Lab/gh-p/Teamwork-Lab
https://community.atlassian.com/forums/Teamwork-Lab-articles/Welcome-to-the-Teamwork-Lab/ba-p/1741147
Atlassian Team Anywhere - Distributed Work
https://www.atlassian.com/solutions/distributed
Kate Lister
Global Workplace Analytics
https://www.linkedin.com/in/klister/
https://globalworkplaceanalytics.com/
J Curve
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_curve
—----
2025-May-01
The Gallup 2025 Workplace Report Shows Engagement Is Falling and Managers Hold the Key
Rachel Murray, Inclusion Geeks
https://www.inclusiongeeks.com/articles/the-gallup-2025-workplace-report-shows-engagement-is-falling-and-managers-hold-the-key/
2025-May
State of the Global Workplace 2025 Report
Gallup
https://www.gallup.com/workplace/349484/state-of-the-global-workplace.aspx
2025-April-29
From Facilities to Facilitation: The Great Workplace Reset: PagerDuty and Atlassian: Building Workplaces That Amplify Teams
Brian Elliott, Work Forward Substack
https://theworkforward.substack.com/p/from-facilities-to-facilitation-the
2025-April-23
Global Engagement Falls for the Second Time Since 2009
By Jim Harter and Ryan Pendell, Gallup Workplace
https://www.gallup.com/workplace/659279/global-engagement-falls-second-time-2009.aspx
2025-March-03
How to Get Real About Measuring to Outcomes
By Brian Elliott, MIT Sloan Management Review
https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/how-to-get-real-about-measuring-to-outcomes/
2024-August-13
Brian Elliott v2: AI, Experiment, Outcomes, Trust | Work 20XX podcast with Jeff Frick Ep28
https://www.work20xx.com/episode/brian-elliott-v2-ai-experiment-outcomes-trust-work-20xx-ep28
2023-June-23
Brian Elliott: Connected, Effective, Workplace Future | Work 20XX podcast with Jeff Frick Ep15
https://www.work20xx.com/episode/brian-elliott-connected-effective-workplace-future-work-20xx-15
2023-April-08
Kate Lister | Research, People, Trust | Work 20XX podcast with Jeff Frick Ep12
https://www.work20xx.com/episode/kate-lister-research-people-trust-work-20xx-12
2024 Workplace Flexibility Trends Report
By TechSmith
https://www.techsmith.com/research-2024-workplace-flexibility-trends-report.html
—------------------------
Disclaimer and Disclosure
All products, product names, companies, logos, names, brands, service names, trademarks, registered trademarks, and registered trademarks (collectively, *identifiers) are the property of their respective owners. All *identifiers used are for identification purposes only. Use of these *identifiers does not imply endorsement. Other trademarks are trade names that may be used in this document to refer to either the entities claiming the marks and/or names of their products and are the property of their respective owners.
We disclaim proprietary interest in the marks and names of others.
No representation is made or warranty given as to their content.
The user assumes all risks of use.
© Copyright 2025 Menlo Creek Media, llc.